• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

MDC Systems

Providing Expert Solutions
for Projects Worldwide


PH: (610) 640.9600 | FX: (484) 301.0969

MENUMENU
  • About
  • Services
    • Construction Claims
    • Construction Management
    • CPM Scheduling/TIA®
    • Construction Dispute Resolution
    • Forensic Services
    • Expert Witness
    • Project Management
    • Risk Assessment
    • Modeling, BIM, Schedule, WUFI®
    • Energy/Sustainability Consulting
    • Government Services
    • Benchmarking
  • Professionals
  • Projects
    • Projects By Category
      • Building Diagnostics
      • Construction Claims
      • CPM Scheduling
      • Owner Issues
      • Project Management
      • Time Impact Analysis®
    • Projects by Industry
      • Commercial
      • Educational
      • Government
      • Industrial
      • Institutional
      • Pharmaceutical
  • Articles & Seminars
    • Seminars
    • Articles
  • Brochures
    • General Overview (PDF)
    • Forensic Engineering (PDF)
    • Schedule Analysis TIA (PDF)
    • Building Diagnostics (PDF)
    • Green Building & Sustainability (PDF)
  • MDCAdvisor®
  • Contact

Complexity is Often the Culprit in Cost Overruns, Delays

Viewpoint, Project Delays and Cost Overruns as Published in ENR
By Robert C. McCue, PE, MDC Systems® Consultant

View PDF of article
View Article in ENR

Robert C McCueOur long history and experience is that the failure rate for projects in general has remained high. Why haven’t the advances in project management science, computers technology and communications been effectively brought to bear on the engineering and construction business? What about the advertised beneficial impact of 3-D computer-aided design, computerized critical path methods schedules and building information modeling? Are today’s engineers not as good as those who built the mega project of yesteryear like the Panama Canal, Empire State Building or Hoover Dam?

Owners, architects, engineers and contractors have been unable to deliver on-time, on-budget projects because of the complexity of capital projects and the inherent instability created by the contractual structure of the participants, which contain incentives/disincentives to proactively solve problems and seek to avoid blame.

In his book, “The Black Swan,” Nassim Nicholas Taleb recounts in detail the “modern” statistical approach to determining the likelihood of an event. As he points out, we simply discount the rare and infrequent events because they may not happen in a normal lifetime. However, when they do occur, they disrupt the business environment in such a way that all of the underlying assumptions used to develop the project plan and execution strategy are revised and the reactions to and/or effects of the event are disproportionate and transient. Normalcy may not be quickly recovered and the resulting secondary interactions of the event/events further confuse and distort matters.

Fundamental systems thinking calls for optimizing the overall system and its output and not the individual parts of the system. Optimizing doesn’t necessarily require optimizing all components.

Initial Optimism

The project team’s reaction may be determined in part by the context of the particular project and the perceived difficulty of achieving the goals of the original project. At the beginning they are optimistic and believe that best practices of project management will minimize the chance of failure. They model their construction projects in 3-D CAD sytems and schedule activities in critical-path management schedules, creating an expectation of control and success that helps to “sell” the project.
But control of the project is tenuous at best and subject to independent action by contractors and other participants. Success isn’t predictable or insured in the real world of complex, changing and sporadic interactions and competing priorities.

We don’t believe it’s good planning to utilize the most optimistic date for every work element of a three-year engineering and construction project and expect to improve on the delivery date and cost targets once the contracts are advertised for bid. A more rational approach would be to use a Monte Carlo analysis to bound the time-frames expected for the major design and construction tasks and then produce a schedule of the most likely durations and completion dates given the most recent project histories for that environment. Incentive clauses could then be crafted to accelerate at reasonable cost the interim completion dates for sequential critical tasks.

Even with these cautions, Black Swan events might still frustrate and delay completion and add to project costs. What can you do? It’s important to stay alert to the arrival of complexity by checking to see if established project management metrics are reliable and if “critical” activities are increasing in number on the CPM schedule or represent more than 50% of the activities. It’s also important to note if CPM updates are overshadowed by events and outdated before issue, if increased staffing resources don’t equate to additional completion gains and if small events trigger large impacts on multiple work activities. Confusing signals and conflicting direction from traditional management tools are another sign of trouble, as it is when the project team becomes increasingly frustrated. Project managers must implement trial-and-error approaches to search for solutions, and project teams must react with reflective, insightful leadership. In this way, understandings of complexity can be applied to reveal the root causes of impending project failure and to avoid them.

Robert C. McCue is a consulting engineer with forensic engineering consultant MDC Systems, Paoli, PA. He can be reached at mccue@mdcsystems.com.

Post Views: 263

You may like:

  • MDCSystems® Taking Off with Commercial Drones
  • MDC Advisor® Expert Newsletter
  • Change Orders: Maximizing Benefits for Owners
  • Privatization of American Water Utilities

Primary Sidebar

Latest News

  • MDCSystems® Taking Off with Commercial Drones
  • MDC Advisor® Expert Newsletter
  • Change Orders: Maximizing Benefits for Owners
  • Privatization of American Water Utilities
  • Building Information Modeling – Boon or Bane?
  • Shipyard Contracts: New Construction vs. Ship Repair
  • MDC Advisor® Expert Newsletter
  • Why is there a Labor Overrun?
  • Avoiding Death by a Thousand Cuts
  • Sustainability – Un-Definable Success in a Defined World
  • Modeling of a Residential Photovoltaic System and Model Validation Using Measured Data
  • Time Impact Analysis (TIA®)
  • Risk Management: Insuring Continuity of Supply
  • More Than Just Counting Rainy Days: Documenting Weather Delays

Footer

Headquarters United States

MDC Systems®

1800 E. Lancaster Ave.
Suite -P Paoli, PA 19301
Map/Directions

Phone and Fax

Phone: 610.640.9600
Fax: 484.301.0969

Email

Robert C. McCue, PE
mccue@mdcsystems.com

Popular News

  • MDC Advisor® Expert Newsletter
  • Overcoming Complexity-Intellectual Foundation of the Concepts
  • CAD and Models – If 4-D is good, then 5-D must be better
  • Forensic Project Management
  • Design-Build – What Every Underwriter Should Know

Associations

Chartered Institute of Arbitrators
American Bar Association
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning
International Code Council
Forum on Construction Law
Building Construction Association
National Society of Professional Engineers

©1998 by MDCSystems, Inc. MDCSystemsSM, Time Impact AnalysisSM, TIASM, Capital Project Management SystemTM, CPMSTM, Forensic Project ManagementSM, FPMSM, are services marks and/or trademarks of MDCSystems, Inc.

Copyright © 2023 · Slipstream on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in