• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

MDC Systems

Providing Expert Solutions
for Projects Worldwide


PH: (610) 640.9600 | FX: (484) 301.0969

MENUMENU
  • About
  • Services
    • Construction Claims
    • Construction Management
    • CPM Scheduling/TIA®
    • Construction Dispute Resolution
    • Forensic Services
    • Expert Witness
    • Project Management
    • Risk Assessment
    • Modeling, BIM, Schedule, WUFI®
    • Energy/Sustainability Consulting
    • Government Services
    • Benchmarking
  • Professionals
  • Projects
    • Projects By Category
      • Building Diagnostics
      • Construction Claims
      • CPM Scheduling
      • Owner Issues
      • Project Management
      • Time Impact Analysis®
    • Projects by Industry
      • Commercial
      • Educational
      • Government
      • Industrial
      • Institutional
      • Pharmaceutical
  • Seminars/Training
  • Brochures
    • General Overview (PDF)
    • Forensic Engineering (PDF)
    • Schedule Analysis TIA (PDF)
    • Building Diagnostics (PDF)
    • Green Building & Sustainability (PDF)
  • News
  • Contact

The Different Techniques of ADR

Mediation

Alternative dispute resolution can often be a faster, cheaper and satisfactory means of settling disputes. Granted, that doesn’t mean that ADR is going to be right for everyone, and it won’t be the best choice for every dispute. However, it is certainly something to consider. There are a number of different techniques used in ADR, and if you’re considering it, you should be familiar with them.

Mediation

Mediation utilizes the assistance of a go-between third-party member, referred to as a “mediator.” The mediator’s job is to help both parties reach some sort of mutual agreement. Your mediator can’t take sides, can’t force you to come to an agreement, and is not allowed to decide the outcome of the dispute. Mediators can be very helpful, but the agreements reached are typically non-binding. That means that if you still wish to pursue litigation after mediation, you are free to do so. During mediation, both parties can maintain a significant amount of control over the process.

Arbitration

Like mediation, arbitration also relies on the use of a neutral third party. Your arbitrator will act in a similar fashion to a judge during trial. Since disputes can get very technical and complex at times, your arbitrator will generally be an expert in an appropriate field. The arbitrator will listen to both parties’ grievances and then will pronounce a decision. Although similar to a trial in many ways, arbitration doesn’t follow all of the rules of evidence that a trial does. Arbitration can be either binding or non-binding.

Negotiation

If you’re comfortable with informal dispute resolution, negotiation may be an excellent option. It doesn’t have the formality of a trial or trial-like setting, nor is there a neutral third party present. A negotiation can be as informal as both parties make it, and it can be a good option if both parties are largely cordial with one another. Negotiations are open-ended, so they can be as quick or as lengthy as needed. Ultimately, the purpose of a negotiation is to reach some sort of agreeable compromise.

These are common ADR techniques used for construction dispute resolution, but this is not an exhaustive list. You should do your research and decide on the best course of action possible for you and your particular situation.

Post Views: 1,306

You may like:

  • The Project is Flat -Technology Blurs the Lines & Sharpens the Edge
  • Project Documentation: Win the Paper Battle
  • Stucco and Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems (EIFS) – Latent Defects Leading to Failure
  • Protecting Profitability

Primary Sidebar

Latest News

  • Just-In-Time Supply Chains Could be in Trouble
  • Protecting Profitability
  • Complexity: The Fifth Dimension of Project Management
  • The Different Techniques of ADR
  • The Role of a Construction Claim Consultant
  • The Benefits of CPM Scheduling
  • Standard of Care Engineering: What You Should Know
  • How Forensic Engineers Help with Building Diagnostics
  • The Importance of Critical Path Method in Project Management
  • Risk Management Tips – Utilize an Effective Design Review
  • Construction Miracles CAN Happen
  • Project Risk Management – The Real Cost of Value Engineering
  • Is the CPM Critical Path REAL or IMAGINARY?
  • Mitch Swann, PE, Named to Pennsylvania Uniform Construction Code Review and Advisory Council

Footer

Headquarters United States

MDC Systems®

1800 E. Lancaster Ave.
Suite -P Paoli, PA 19301
Map/Directions

Phone and Fax

Phone: 610.640.9600
Fax: 484.301.0969

Email

Robert C. McCue, PE
mccue@mdcsystems.com

Popular News

  • Is it time to Finally implement fire resistive residential construction in California?
  • Risk Management – Restarting the Construction Project
  • Just-In-Time Supply Chains Could be in Trouble
  • What Is A Premortem

Associations

Chartered Institute of Arbitrators
American Bar Association
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning
International Code Council
Forum on Construction Law
Building Construction Association
National Society of Professional Engineers

©1998 by MDCSystems, Inc. MDCSystemsSM, Time Impact AnalysisSM, TIASM, Capital Project Management SystemTM, CPMSTM, Forensic Project ManagementSM, FPMSM, are services marks and/or trademarks of MDCSystems, Inc.

Copyright © 2021 · Slipstream on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in