MDC Advisor
 
November 2012
Volume 36
 
   
 
In This Issue
-- Hurricane Sandy: Another Storm, Same Recovery Challenges

-- Risk Management: Recognizing & Prioritizing Project Risks 

-- Current Events
 
   

Current Events

ISPE/Energy Savings
King of Prussia, PA
November 7th
MDC joined distinquished colleagues at this event. Workshops included the implementation of Superior Energy Performance [SEP] and ISO 50001 energy management system concepts and/or certification programs. Energy savings for facilities with respect to design, implementation, performance and certification were also presented.
Get More Info


Wall Street Energy Briefing, New York, New York 
November 13th 
MDC joined notable leaders and innovators from around the nation to explore the cutting edge in energy investment, financing and regulation. This popular event included in-depth panel discussions including "A World of Inexpensive Gas" and "Solar's Access to the Capital Markets."
Get More Info


IRMI Construction Risk Conference, Orlando, FL
November 11-15th  
MDC joined about 1,200 risk professionals from all sectors of the industry to network and learn. Topics discussed included risk management strategies, claims settlements and control risk costs.
Get More Info 
 
 

Contact Us

MDCSystems® Headquarters

37 North Valley Road
3 Station Square, Suite 100
Paoli, PA 19301
Ph: 610.640.9600
Toll Free: 1.888.MDC.9977
Fax: 610.640.9609


MDCSystems® International

3 Amberdeen Avenue
London, England UK N3 3BJ
Ph: 44 (0) 20 8346 8455
Fax: 44 (0) 20 8371 8635
 

Contact Us
Visit Our Website

Follow us on LinkedIn

 

 
 
 
Another Storm, Same Recovery Challenges
By Robert C. McCue, PE
MDCSystems® Consulting Engineer

Fully two weeks after Hurricane Sandy, the recovery efforts are still frustrated by the lack of fuel and communication. These scenes are all too familiar.  There must be a better way to truly prepare for these events and to avoid the familiar storm after effects.
 
In my personal experience, gasoline lines (fuel shortages) and communications problems have been predictable after effects of major storms for fifty years.  My first storm recovery effort was Hurricane Agnes in 1972.  At the time I was a student at Penn State University (recently released from four years of active duty) and a Captain in the Pennsylvania National Guard based out of Lewistown, PA.  During the storm we performed rescue and evacuation work in and around Lewistown and then food distribution and fuel delivery to local municipalities on the I - 80 corridor from Altoona to Scranton.  Many roads were destroyed in Central Pennsylvania and many bridges were missing resulting in isolation for many communities.  
 
 
A significant problem in coordinating logistics was the lack of communications between the various state and local governments.  We had supplies at point A but the folks at Point B could not request what they needed.  We attempted to solve this problem using mini-convoys of National Guard trucks and fuel tankers. We also escorted commercial semi-trailers of foodstuffs to communities along our supply routes.
 
 
Similar state and local actions took place after Hurricane Katrina in Louisiana and now we are watching comparable recovery efforts in New York and New Jersey. But why wasn't the expected emergency response to Hurricane Sandy better planned and timelier?  After all, the weather reports gave us plenty of time to prepare. The day after the storm all the right signals (TV interviews and speeches) were sent and promises were made to restore the situation to normal. However, the reality is that weeks later many communities still lack commercial power, communications and fuel -predictably making a bad situation worse.

Read More...
  
 

risk
Risk Management: Recognizing & Prioritizing Project Risk 

By Michelle N. Delehanty, PE, PMP
MDCSystems® Consulting Engineer
 
One of the biggest components in successfully managing your capital program is a strong risk management plan. A project risk assessment is usually performed during project kickoff with all stakeholders contributing to the list of risks because the earlier in the project you plan for certain events, the lower the chances of the associated risks tend to be. In order to successfully mitigate risks, they must be prioritized based on their overall effect on the project. If every item that poses a potential risk to the project is considered high-priority, then the result is that nothing is a high priority because everything is considered equal. The major keys to reducing the impact of any risk to a project are to recognize, prioritize, and control.
Recognizing Risk
 
Any event, large or small, can be considered a risk to a project if there is a chance it will impact the scope, schedule, or budget. It is important to examine all programs that are running concurrent with your project as well as within the project itself for any effects they may have. Common ways that project management veterans recognize potential future risks is to look into the past, starting with lessons learned. 
 
 
The lessons learned list is usually comprised of items that may not have been considered during the previous project planning but affected the outcome of that project in some way. Remembering the effect these issues had on previous projects and preparing for similar outcomes will keep you from repeating comparable missteps on project after project.
 
 
Read More...
 
 
         
  We do not sell, share or distribute email addresses to or with any party outside of our office. Copyright © 2010 MDCSystems®. All rights reserved. The newsletter is protected by U.S. and international copyright and intellectual property laws. The commercial use of MDCSystems® materials without the express written consent of MDCSystems® is prohibited by law.